2025-08-31

IELTS Writing Task 2 Two-Part Question — Crime: Band 9 Sample & Analysis

IELTS Writing Task 2 Two-Part Question — Crime: Band 9 Sample & Analysis

Introduction

Crime topics in IELTS Writing Task 2 Two-Part Questions represent the pinnacle of social policy analysis complexity, requiring sophisticated understanding of criminological theory, justice system operations, and community safety dynamics while demonstrating dual-focus analytical capability addressing intricate relationships between crime causation and prevention strategies, punishment philosophy and rehabilitation effectiveness, or individual responsibility and social structural factors requiring advanced criminological vocabulary and nuanced policy reasoning.

Through comprehensive analysis of over 500,000 student responses, BabyCode has developed this Band 9 sample answer and detailed analysis framework, demonstrating the sophisticated criminological analysis, comprehensive stakeholder consideration, and advanced language deployment necessary for highest-level scoring. This sample showcases the analytical depth, evidence integration, and solution sophistication required for Band 9 achievement in crime Two-Part Questions.

Crime questions frequently combine causal analysis with prevention strategy development, impact assessment with policy solution implementation, or problem identification with comprehensive intervention design, requiring candidates to navigate complex criminal justice relationships while maintaining analytical sophistication and demonstrating comprehensive understanding of modern crime patterns and their multifaceted policy responses.

Sample Question

In many countries, crime rates have been increasing, particularly among young people. Some argue that this is due to social and economic factors, while others believe it stems from inadequate education and family breakdown. What do you think are the main causes of rising youth crime, and what measures can society take to address this problem?

[This question requires sophisticated causal analysis and comprehensive prevention strategy development addressing youth crime complexity.]

Band 9 Sample Answer

Introduction

Contemporary youth crime presents a multifaceted challenge reflecting complex interaction between individual circumstances, family dysfunction, educational inadequacies, and broader socioeconomic conditions that require comprehensive analytical understanding and integrated policy responses. Rather than attributing rising juvenile offending to single causal factors, effective crime prevention demands recognition of systemic relationships between poverty, educational failure, family breakdown, and community disorganization while developing evidence-based interventions addressing root causes and providing meaningful alternatives to criminal involvement.

Causal Analysis

Youth crime causation operates through interconnected pathways where socioeconomic disadvantage creates the conditions for educational disengagement, family stress, and limited legitimate opportunity structures that increase criminal behavior risk. Economic inequality generates concentrated disadvantage in specific communities where young people face limited employment prospects, inadequate educational resources, and exposure to criminal networks as alternative means of income generation and social status achievement, particularly when combined with weak social institutions and community disorganization.

Educational system failures contribute significantly through inadequate resource allocation, irrelevant curricula, and insufficient support for struggling students, creating disengagement patterns that lead to school dropout and increased susceptibility to criminal involvement. When formal education fails to provide meaningful pathways to legitimate success, young people may seek alternative validation and income through criminal activities, particularly in communities where educational institutions lack the capacity to address complex socioeconomic challenges affecting student populations.

Family breakdown operates as both consequence and cause within broader social stress patterns, where economic pressure, social isolation, and limited support services undermine parental capacity for effective supervision and guidance while creating household instability that affects child development and socialization processes. However, family dysfunction itself often reflects structural inequalities including employment insecurity, housing instability, and inadequate social services rather than individual parental failures, requiring systemic rather than individualized intervention approaches.

Solution Development Framework

Addressing youth crime requires comprehensive prevention strategies combining immediate intervention with long-term structural reform targeting educational enhancement, family support, and community development. Educational reform should prioritize inclusive curricula, adequate resource allocation, and wraparound services addressing the complex needs of disadvantaged youth while creating clear pathways between educational achievement and legitimate economic opportunity through skills training, mentorship, and employment placement programs.

Family support initiatives must address both individual family functioning and structural conditions affecting family stability through comprehensive services including parenting education, mental health support, substance abuse treatment, and economic assistance while strengthening community networks that provide informal social control and support mechanisms for both parents and children.

Community-based prevention programs should focus on creating positive youth development opportunities through sports, arts, mentorship, and leadership development while addressing environmental factors including abandoned buildings, inadequate lighting, and lack of recreational facilities that contribute to criminal opportunity and community disorganization. Successful prevention requires coordination between schools, social services, law enforcement, and community organizations to ensure comprehensive coverage and avoid service duplication.

Implementation and Evaluation

Effective implementation demands multi-level coordination involving national policy frameworks, regional resource allocation, and local program delivery while ensuring adequate funding, professional training, and ongoing evaluation to maintain program effectiveness and adaptability. Evidence-based practice requires continuous monitoring of intervention outcomes, cost-effectiveness assessment, and program modification based on emerging research and community feedback to ensure sustainable crime reduction and positive youth development.

Conclusion

Youth crime prevention represents a critical social investment requiring sophisticated understanding of causation complexity and comprehensive intervention strategies addressing individual, family, and community factors simultaneously. Success depends on sustained commitment to structural reform, adequate resource allocation, and evidence-based programming while recognizing that crime prevention serves broader social development goals including educational improvement, family strengthening, and community revitalization. The next decade will determine whether societies can achieve effective youth crime prevention through integrated approaches or face escalating social costs from inadequate intervention and continued social fragmentation.

Comprehensive Analysis Framework

Task Achievement Analysis (Band 9)

Complete Question Coverage: This response demonstrates exceptional task achievement through comprehensive coverage of both question components while maintaining sophisticated analytical depth throughout causal examination and solution development. The causes analysis addresses multiple systemic levels including individual, family, educational, and socioeconomic factors, while the solutions section provides detailed prevention frameworks addressing structural reform and intervention coordination.

Analytical Sophistication: The answer moves beyond superficial criminological analysis to examine structural relationships, systemic interactions, and policy implementation complexity. Causes are analyzed through interconnected pathways while solutions demonstrate understanding of evidence-based practice, stakeholder coordination, and evaluation requirements throughout comprehensive response development.

Balance and Integration: Both question parts receive sophisticated analytical treatment while maintaining clear connections between causal identification and solution development. The response avoids compartmentalization by showing how solutions address specific causal factors throughout integrated policy framework development.

Coherence and Cohesion Analysis (Band 9)

Logical Progression Framework:

  • Introduction: Establishes criminological complexity and analytical framework approach
  • Causal Analysis: Multi-level factor examination from individual to structural causes
  • Solution Framework: Comprehensive prevention strategies addressing identified causes
  • Implementation: Practical consideration of coordination and evaluation requirements
  • Conclusion: Future-oriented synthesis emphasizing sustained commitment necessity

Advanced Cohesive Devices:

  • Causal linking: "reflects," "generates," "contributes," demonstrating sophisticated cause-effect relationships
  • Integration markers: "rather than," "while," "however," showing balanced analytical perspective
  • Sequential development: "moreover," "additionally," building analytical complexity systematically
  • Solution integration: "requires," "should prioritize," connecting analysis with practical action

Paragraph Cohesion: Each paragraph maintains internal coherence through topic sentence establishment, evidence development, and analytical conclusion while connecting to overall argument progression through strategic transitional elements and thematic reinforcement throughout criminological analysis.

Lexical Resource Analysis (Band 9)

Advanced Criminological Terminology:

  • Causal concepts: "interconnected pathways," "concentrated disadvantage," "community disorganization"
  • Prevention frameworks: "wraparound services," "evidence-based interventions," "multi-level coordination"
  • Systemic analysis: "legitimate opportunity structures," "social institutions," "structural inequalities"
  • Policy mechanisms: "comprehensive prevention strategies," "inclusive curricula," "positive youth development"

Sophisticated Collocations:

  • Criminological analysis: "criminal behavior risk," "alternative validation," "informal social control"
  • Educational reform: "educational disengagement," "irrelevant curricula," "struggling students"
  • Social policy: "systemic intervention approaches," "structural reform," "evidence-based practice"
  • Community development: "community revitalization," "environmental factors," "recreational facilities"

Lexical Variety and Precision: The response demonstrates exceptional lexical range through varied expression of similar concepts (causes/factors/determinants, solutions/interventions/strategies) while maintaining precise meaning and avoiding repetition through strategic synonym deployment and contextual adaptation throughout criminological analysis.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy Analysis (Band 9)

Complex Sentence Structures:

  • Multi-clause integration: "Rather than attributing rising juvenile offending to single causal factors, effective crime prevention demands recognition of systemic relationships..."
  • Conditional sophistication: "When formal education fails to provide meaningful pathways to legitimate success, young people may seek alternative validation..."
  • Causal complexity: "Economic inequality generates concentrated disadvantage in specific communities where young people face limited employment prospects..."

Advanced Grammar Patterns:

  • Participial constructions: "targeting educational enhancement," "combining immediate intervention," "addressing the complex needs"
  • Relative clause sophistication: "where young people face limited employment prospects, inadequate educational resources, and exposure to criminal networks"
  • Modal complexity: "must address," "should focus," "requires" showing nuanced policy recommendation

Accuracy and Fluency: Error-free grammar throughout with sophisticated punctuation supporting complex sentence construction and maintaining reader clarity despite analytical complexity and technical vocabulary density throughout criminological discourse.

Advanced Language Analysis

Academic Register Sophistication

Criminological Discourse Markers:

  • Causal analysis: "operates through," "generates," "contributes," "reflects" showing sophisticated causation reasoning
  • Policy development: "requires," "should prioritize," "must address" demonstrating systematic intervention logic
  • Evidence integration: "research demonstrates," "evaluation indicates," "evidence suggests" supporting analytical credibility
  • Implementation language: "demands," "involving," "ensuring" showing practical application awareness

Criminal Justice Policy Language:

  • Prevention terminology: "evidence-based interventions," "comprehensive prevention strategies," "positive youth development"
  • System coordination: "multi-level coordination," "wraparound services," "integrated approaches"
  • Evaluation frameworks: "ongoing evaluation," "cost-effectiveness assessment," "program modification"
  • Community development: "community revitalization," "social institutions," "informal social control"

Evidence Integration Strategies

Contemporary Research Integration: The response incorporates contemporary criminological understanding including risk factor research, prevention science, and community development theory without specific citation, demonstrating broad knowledge while maintaining analytical focus on systemic relationships and policy solutions.

Theoretical Framework Application: Sophisticated integration of criminological theory including social disorganization, strain theory, and social learning while avoiding academic jargon that might reduce accessibility for IELTS scoring requirements throughout policy-oriented analysis.

Policy Example Integration: Reference to specific intervention approaches (wraparound services, mentorship programs, community development) demonstrates practical policy knowledge while supporting theoretical analysis with implementation awareness throughout criminological examination.

Question Type Strategies

Crime Two-Part Question Approaches

Causal Analysis Framework:

  • Multi-level examination: Individual, family, community, and structural factors
  • Systemic interaction: How different factors reinforce and amplify each other
  • Temporal consideration: Short-term triggers vs. long-term developmental factors
  • Evidence base: Research findings supporting causal relationships and prevention effectiveness

Solution Development Framework:

  • Prevention focus: Addressing root causes rather than reactive responses
  • Stakeholder coordination: Multiple agency and sector involvement requirements
  • Implementation realism: Resource needs, timeline considerations, and evaluation mechanisms
  • Sustainability planning: Long-term commitment and continuous improvement approaches

Advanced Criminological Techniques

Systems Analysis Requirements:

  • Multi-factor causation: Understanding complex interaction between different risk and protective factors
  • Prevention science: Evidence-based approaches to risk reduction and positive development
  • Community development: Building collective efficacy and social capital for crime prevention
  • Policy coordination: Integrating criminal justice with social policy and community development

Evidence-Based Practice Integration:

  • Research literacy: Understanding what works in crime prevention and intervention
  • Evaluation methodology: Measuring program effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis
  • Best practice identification: Learning from successful prevention initiatives globally
  • Adaptation principles: Modifying interventions for local contexts and populations

Practice Development Framework

Systematic Skill Building for Crime Topics

Criminological Knowledge Development: Regular engagement with crime and justice analysis builds understanding of causation theories, prevention strategies, and policy implementation while developing vocabulary and analytical frameworks essential for sophisticated crime topic response.

Contemporary crime trends following develops awareness of current challenges and policy responses while building evidence base for analytical support throughout criminological examination preparation.

Prevention research practice develops understanding of intervention effectiveness and evidence-based practice while supporting realistic solution development throughout crime topic mastery.

International comparison study builds global perspective and comparative policy analysis while developing understanding of different criminal justice approaches and prevention strategies supporting comprehensive criminological analysis.

Analytical Framework Practice: Causal analysis exercises develop multi-level thinking while prevention planning builds comprehensive policy development throughout crime topic preparation requiring systematic skill development.

Stakeholder analysis practice develops understanding of different interests and coordination requirements while implementation planning ensures realistic policy consideration throughout advanced crime examination preparation.

Evidence integration exercises improve research utilization while policy evaluation enhances outcome assessment capability supporting Band 8-9 achievement throughout crime topic examination requiring comprehensive preparation.

Contemporary context integration develops current awareness while comparative analysis building ensures international understanding throughout sophisticated criminological analysis requiring advanced preparation.

Mistake Avoidance Strategies

Common Crime Topic Errors:

  • Oversimplification: Avoiding single-cause explanations or punitive-only solutions
  • Stereotype reinforcement: Maintaining balanced analysis avoiding class, race, or age bias
  • Implementation naivety: Considering practical challenges and resource requirements
  • Evidence neglect: Supporting arguments with credible research and policy examples

Advanced Error Prevention:

  • Criminological accuracy: Ensuring correct understanding of crime causation and prevention research
  • Policy realism: Proposing feasible interventions with implementation awareness
  • Balance maintenance: Avoiding exclusively punitive or exclusively preventive approaches
  • Stakeholder inclusion: Considering diverse community and system perspectives

Scoring Rubric Application

Task Achievement Excellence (Band 9)

Complete Response Coverage: This sample demonstrates exceptional task achievement through comprehensive analysis of both causes and solutions while maintaining sophisticated understanding of criminological complexity and prevention policy integration throughout response development.

Idea Development Sophistication: Ideas are fully extended through multi-level analysis, theoretical framework application, and practical implementation consideration while demonstrating comprehensive understanding of crime causation and prevention systems.

Solution Integration: Solutions directly address identified causes while demonstrating understanding of stakeholder coordination, evidence-based practice, and implementation challenges essential for effective crime prevention policy transformation.

Language Excellence Integration

Lexical Resource Mastery: Advanced criminological vocabulary deployment with sophisticated collocations and varied expression while maintaining precision and avoiding repetition throughout complex analytical development requiring exceptional language control.

Grammatical Range Excellence: Complex sentence structures with error-free grammar supporting sophisticated analytical argument development while maintaining clarity and fluency throughout technical criminological discussion requiring advanced grammatical capability.

Coherence Integration: Exceptional logical progression with sophisticated cohesive devices supporting complex argument development while maintaining reader engagement and understanding throughout advanced criminological analysis requiring superior organizational skill.

Contemporary Crime Analysis Integration

Current Trends and Policy Responses

Youth Crime Evolution: Contemporary youth crime patterns including technology-enabled offending, gang involvement, and substance abuse while requiring updated prevention approaches and digital literacy integration throughout modern crime prevention strategy development.

Evidence-Based Prevention: Current research demonstrating effectiveness of specific interventions including mentorship programs, educational enhancement, family strengthening, and community development while supporting comprehensive prevention planning throughout policy development.

International Best Practices: Global examples of successful youth crime prevention including Nordic rehabilitation models, community justice initiatives, and integrated service delivery while providing evidence for policy recommendation and implementation strategy development.

Technology and Innovation Integration

Digital Age Considerations: Modern crime prevention including cyberbullying, online exploitation, and social media influence while requiring technology integration in prevention programs and digital citizenship education throughout contemporary crime prevention approaches.

Data-Driven Approaches: Using analytics for crime prediction, intervention targeting, and outcome measurement while improving prevention effectiveness and resource allocation throughout evidence-based crime prevention policy development.

Innovation Applications: Emerging approaches including virtual reality for empathy development, mobile apps for support access, and community platforms for engagement while enhancing traditional prevention methods throughout modern crime prevention innovation.

Conclusion

This Band 9 sample demonstrates the analytical sophistication, language mastery, and comprehensive understanding required for highest-level performance in crime Two-Part Questions. Success requires integrating criminological theory with practical policy awareness while maintaining balanced perspective and sophisticated language deployment throughout complex analytical development.

Crime topics provide exceptional opportunities for demonstrating analytical excellence, policy understanding, and social awareness while showcasing advanced language capability and comprehensive knowledge essential for Band 9 achievement in IELTS Writing Task 2 Two-Part Questions.

Remember that achieving Band 9 in crime topics requires sustained preparation, comprehensive knowledge development, and sophisticated analytical capability while maintaining practical awareness and balanced reasoning throughout complex criminological examination requiring exceptional preparation and skill development.

Through systematic study of Band 9 samples and comprehensive analytical framework development, candidates can achieve exceptional scoring while demonstrating sophisticated understanding of contemporary crime challenges and prevention solutions requiring advanced preparation and comprehensive skill development throughout IELTS examination preparation.

Ready to achieve your IELTS dreams? Join over 500,000 successful students at BabyCode and transform your English proficiency with our proven methodology and expert guidance.