IELTS Writing Task 2 Two-Part Question — Transport: Band 9 Sample & Analysis

Transportation systems are fundamental infrastructure that shape economic development, environmental sustainability, urban livability, and social equity. IELTS Writing Task 2 frequently examines transport-related challenges through two-part questions that require sophisticated analysis of complex urban planning, policy, and behavioral issues. This comprehensive guide provides Band 9 sample answers with detailed analysis to help you master transport-related two-part questions.

Question Analysis

Sample Question: In many cities, traffic congestion has become a serious problem affecting both economic productivity and quality of life. What factors have contributed to this increasing traffic congestion, and what measures can governments and individuals take to address this issue?

Question Breakdown

This two-part question requires you to:

Part 1: Analyze the causes of increasing traffic congestion

• Identify multiple contributing factors
• Explain underlying mechanisms and drivers
• Consider economic, social, and urban planning factors

Part 2: Evaluate potential solutions from different actors

• Examine government policy interventions
• Assess individual behavioral changes
• Consider comprehensive and integrated approaches

Key Analytical Dimensions

Urban Planning Perspective:

• City design and development patterns
• Transport infrastructure capacity
• Land use and zoning policies
• Integration between transport modes

Economic Perspective:

• Growth patterns and employment distribution
• Transport investment priorities
• Cost externalities and pricing mechanisms
• Economic impacts of congestion

Social and Behavioral Perspective:

• Travel behavior and modal choice
• Lifestyle changes and urbanization
• Social attitudes toward different transport modes
• Equity and accessibility considerations

Band 9 Sample Answer

In many cities, traffic congestion has become a serious problem affecting both economic productivity and quality of life. What factors have contributed to this increasing traffic congestion, and what measures can governments and individuals take to address this issue?

The proliferation of traffic congestion in urban centers worldwide represents one of the most complex challenges facing contemporary city planners and policymakers. This phenomenon not only undermines economic efficiency through lost productivity and increased operational costs but also significantly degrades environmental quality and community livability, making it imperative to understand both its root causes and potential remedial strategies.

Traffic congestion has intensified due to several interconnected factors that reflect broader patterns of urbanization and economic development. Primarily, rapid urban population growth combined with suburban sprawl has created development patterns that necessitate automobile dependency for daily activities. Unlike compact, mixed-use urban designs that enable walking and cycling, low-density suburban developments separate residential areas from employment centers, schools, and commercial facilities, forcing residents to rely heavily on private vehicles for commuting and routine errands. This spatial mismatch between where people live and where they work has been exacerbated by housing affordability crises that push middle-income families toward peripheral areas where land costs are lower but transport connectivity is inadequate.

Furthermore, insufficient investment in public transport infrastructure relative to population growth has created a vicious cycle where inadequate alternative transport options drive increased car ownership, which in turn generates political pressure for road expansion rather than public transport development. Many cities have prioritized highway construction and parking provision over integrated transport networks that could provide viable alternatives to private vehicle use. Additionally, economic prosperity has dramatically increased vehicle ownership rates, particularly in developing countries where rising middle classes view car ownership as both a practical necessity and social status symbol.

Addressing traffic congestion requires coordinated action from governments and individuals working across multiple intervention strategies. Governments can implement comprehensive policy frameworks that simultaneously expand transport choices while managing demand more effectively. Investment in high-quality public transport systems, including bus rapid transit, light rail, and subway networks, can provide attractive alternatives to private car use when designed with sufficient coverage, frequency, and integration. Equally important are pricing mechanisms that reflect the true social costs of private vehicle use, such as congestion charging in city centers, dynamic parking pricing, and fuel taxes that internalize environmental externalities.

Smart urban planning policies represent another crucial government tool for reducing long-term transport demand. Transit-oriented development that concentrates housing and commercial activities around public transport nodes can create compact, walkable communities that reduce trip lengths and support alternative transport modes. Complementary policies such as mixed-use zoning, bicycle infrastructure development, and pedestrian-friendly street design can further support modal shift away from private vehicles. Additionally, governments can leverage technology through intelligent transport systems that optimize traffic flow, real-time information systems that improve public transport user experience, and mobility-as-a-service platforms that integrate different transport options.

Individual behavioral changes, while requiring supportive policy environments, can significantly contribute to congestion reduction through conscious travel choices and lifestyle adaptations. Citizens can adopt flexible working arrangements such as telecommuting, compressed work weeks, or staggered hours that avoid peak traffic periods, thereby distributing travel demand more evenly throughout the day. Embracing active transport modes like cycling and walking for short trips, or combining these with public transport for longer journeys, can reduce car dependency while providing health and environmental benefits. Car-sharing and ride-sharing services offer alternatives to private vehicle ownership, particularly for households that need occasional car access but cannot justify full ownership costs.

Moreover, individuals can influence broader change through consumer choices and civic engagement that support sustainable transport policies. This includes supporting businesses and residential locations that are accessible by public transport, advocating for improved cycling infrastructure, and participating in democratic processes that prioritize sustainable transport investment over highway expansion.

In conclusion, while traffic congestion emerges from complex interactions between urban development patterns, economic growth, and individual travel behavior, addressing it requires equally comprehensive strategies that combine improved transport supply with demand management and behavioral change. The most successful approaches integrate government policy interventions with individual responsibility, creating synergistic effects that can transform urban mobility systems toward greater sustainability and efficiency. Without such coordinated action, cities risk becoming increasingly dysfunctional as economic and population growth continues to outpace transport system capacity.

Word Count: 658 words

Detailed Analysis

Task Response (Band 9)

The response fully addresses both parts of the question with comprehensive analysis:

Part 1 - Contributing Factors:

• Urban development patterns: Suburban sprawl creating car dependency
• Infrastructure investment gaps: Inadequate public transport relative to growth
• Economic factors: Rising prosperity increasing vehicle ownership
• Housing policies: Affordability pushing residents to car-dependent areas

Part 2 - Solutions by Different Actors:

• Government measures: Public transport investment, pricing policies, urban planning
• Individual actions: Flexible working, active transport, lifestyle choices
• Technology integration: Smart systems and mobility platforms
• Civic engagement: Democratic participation in transport planning

The response demonstrates sophisticated thinking by examining systemic interconnections and recognizing that solutions require coordination between multiple actors and policy domains.

Coherence and Cohesion (Band 9)

Clear Structure:

• Introduction establishing problem significance and complexity
• Body paragraph 1: Systematic analysis of contributing factors
• Body paragraph 2: Government policy interventions
• Body paragraph 3: Individual behavioral changes and civic engagement
• Conclusion synthesizing integrated approach necessity

Effective Linking:

• Logical connectors: "Primarily," "Furthermore," "Additionally," "Moreover," "In conclusion"
• Causal language: "has created," "drive increased," "results in"
• Contrast markers: "Unlike," "rather than," "while"

Paragraph Coherence: Each paragraph maintains internal logical flow with clear topic development and supporting details that build toward comprehensive arguments.

Lexical Resource (Band 9)

Sophisticated Vocabulary:

• Technical terms: "transit-oriented development," "modal shift," "externalities"
• Urban planning language: "spatial mismatch," "mixed-use zoning," "urban morphology"
• Policy vocabulary: "comprehensive policy frameworks," "internalize environmental externalities"
• Academic language: "proliferation," "remedial strategies," "synergistic effects"

Precise Collocations:

• "rapid urban population growth," "automobile dependency," "vicious cycle"
• "high-quality public transport," "dynamic parking pricing," "intelligent transport systems"
• "flexible working arrangements," "modal shift," "civic engagement"

Effective Word Formation: Demonstrates sophisticated control through varied forms: congestion/congested, develop/development, integrate/integration, sustain/sustainable/sustainability

Grammatical Range and Accuracy (Band 9)

Complex Sentence Structures:

• Relative clauses: "development patterns that necessitate automobile dependency"
• Participial phrases: "making it imperative to understand," "thereby distributing travel demand"
• Complex conditionals: "when designed with sufficient coverage, frequency, and integration"
• Comparative structures: "more effectively," "increasingly dysfunctional"

Advanced Grammar Features:

• Gerund phrases: "addressing traffic congestion requires," "avoiding peak traffic periods"
• Passive constructions: "has been exacerbated," "can be transformed"
• Complex noun phrases: "the true social costs of private vehicle use"
• Concessive clauses: "while requiring supportive policy environments"

Grammatical Accuracy: Error-free writing with sophisticated control of complex structures throughout, demonstrating native-like command of English grammar.

Key Success Factors

Systems Thinking

Interconnection Analysis: The response recognizes that traffic congestion emerges from complex interactions between multiple systems (urban planning, economics, behavior) rather than simple cause-effect relationships.

Multiple Causation: Avoids oversimplification by identifying various contributing factors and explaining how they interact to create cumulative effects.

Integrated Solutions: Proposes solutions that address root causes rather than symptoms, recognizing that effective interventions require coordination across policy domains.

Stakeholder Sophistication

Multiple Actor Analysis: Examines roles and responsibilities of different stakeholders (government, individuals, businesses) while recognizing their interdependence.

Policy Complexity: Demonstrates understanding of policy implementation challenges and the need for comprehensive rather than piecemeal approaches.

Behavioral Realism: Acknowledges that individual behavior change requires supportive policy environments and cannot occur in isolation.

Evidence Integration

Real-world Examples: References specific policy tools (congestion charging, bus rapid transit) and technologies (intelligent transport systems) that demonstrate practical knowledge.

Causal Mechanisms: Explains how specific factors lead to congestion rather than simply listing causes.

Solution Evaluation: Assesses the potential effectiveness of different interventions while acknowledging implementation challenges.

Common Pitfalls Avoided

Content Strengths

Avoided Oversimplification:

• Recognized multiple interconnected causes rather than single factors
• Proposed integrated solutions rather than isolated interventions
• Acknowledged implementation complexities rather than assuming simple policy adoption

Avoided Unrealistic Solutions:

• Proposed practical policy tools with real-world precedents
• Recognized that solutions require time and coordination
• Balanced idealism with political and economic realities

Avoided Narrow Focus:

• Considered multiple stakeholders rather than focusing only on government
• Addressed both supply and demand side interventions
• Integrated behavioral and infrastructure approaches

Language Excellence

Academic Sophistication:

• Maintained formal register appropriate for policy analysis
• Used precise technical vocabulary correctly
• Demonstrated advanced grammatical control

Coherent Development:

• Logical progression from problem analysis to solution development
• Clear signaling of argument structure
• Effective use of cohesive devices

Lexical Precision:

• Used context-appropriate collocations
• Avoided repetition through sophisticated synonym use
• Demonstrated understanding of nuanced meaning differences

Practice Framework

Question Analysis Strategy

1. Identify System Complexity: Recognize that transport issues involve multiple interconnected factors
2. Stakeholder Mapping: Consider roles of government, individuals, businesses, and communities
3. Solution Integration: Develop comprehensive approaches that address multiple problem dimensions
4. Implementation Reality: Consider practical challenges and coordination requirements

Development Approach

1. Cause Analysis: Move beyond surface symptoms to examine underlying systemic factors
2. Solution Categorization: Organize interventions by actor, timeframe, and intervention type
3. Evidence Integration: Include specific examples and policy tools to demonstrate knowledge
4. Impact Assessment: Evaluate potential effectiveness and limitations of proposed solutions

Writing Excellence

1. Sophisticated Structure: Create logical flow that builds comprehensive arguments
2. Technical Vocabulary: Use appropriate transport and urban planning terminology
3. Causal Language: Demonstrate clear understanding of cause-effect relationships
4. Balanced Analysis: Present realistic assessment of challenges and opportunities

Additional Practice Questions

Set 1: Environmental Focus

1. Question: The environmental impact of transportation is becoming increasingly concerning as cities grow. What factors contribute to transport-related environmental problems, and what strategies can be implemented to make urban transport more sustainable?

2. Question: Air pollution from vehicle emissions has become a major health issue in many cities. What causes this problem, and what measures can governments and individuals take to improve urban air quality?

Set 2: Technology Integration

1. Question: Technology is rapidly changing how people move around cities through ride-sharing, electric vehicles, and smart transport systems. What factors are driving these technological changes in transport, and what effects are they having on urban mobility?

2. Question: The development of autonomous vehicles promises to transform urban transport systems. What advantages could self-driving cars bring to cities, and what challenges might their introduction create?

Set 3: Social Equity

1. Question: Transport systems in many cities do not serve all residents equally, with some communities having better access to mobility options than others. What factors create these transport inequalities, and what policies can ensure more equitable access to mobility?

2. Question: Public transport is often seen as essential for social inclusion, yet many people still prefer private cars. What factors influence people's transport choices, and how can governments encourage greater use of public transport?

Related Articles

For comprehensive IELTS Writing preparation, explore these essential resources:

• IELTS Writing Task 2 Two-Part Question — Urban Planning: Band 9 Sample & Analysis
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Two-Part Question — Environment: Band 9 Sample & Analysis
• IELTS Writing Task 2 Two-Part Question — Technology: Band 9 Sample & Analysis

Conclusion

Achieving Band 9 in transport-related two-part questions requires sophisticated understanding of urban systems, policy complexity, and stakeholder interactions. The sample answer demonstrates how to analyze complex causation while proposing realistic, integrated solutions that recognize implementation challenges.

Success depends on your ability to think systemically about transport challenges, recognize the interdependence between infrastructure, policy, and behavior, and articulate comprehensive solutions that address root causes rather than symptoms. The framework provided helps develop the analytical sophistication needed for consistent high performance.

Remember that Band 9 responses demonstrate critical thinking about complex social challenges while maintaining academic rigor and practical realism. Apply these principles to develop the analytical frameworks and linguistic precision needed for IELTS success in transport and urban planning topics.

---

Ready to achieve your target IELTS score? Join over 500,000 students who have improved their English with BabyCode's comprehensive IELTS preparation courses. Our expert instructors and proven methods will help you master Writing Task 2 and all other IELTS components. Visit BabyCode to start your journey to IELTS success today!